Designing for an application rather than an envelope
Where permitted development is available, the design problem is compliance: fit the scheme inside a set of measurements and the permission follows. Where it is not — and on a designated Holloway address it generally is not — the problem changes shape entirely. The scheme is assessed against the character of the area and the amenity of the neighbours, which is a judgement rather than a calculation, and the drawings are the argument. In practice that means several things worth budgeting for. A measured survey of the existing house and, importantly, of the neighbouring rear building line, so the proposal can be shown in context rather than in isolation. Elevations and sections that show the terrace as a run, not just your house, because that is how the officer will read it. A design that is legible as subordinate — depth that relates to the established line, a roof form that does not compete with the host, materials that relate to the original brickwork. And an honest account of the daylight relationship with the neighbours, because raising it yourself is far stronger than having it raised for you. None of this is expensive relative to the build. It is the difference between a decision that goes your way first time and a refusal followed by a redesign.