How much of the side gap you should actually build on
The temptation on a wide plot is to build the side extension out to the boundary for the full depth of the house, and on a road of villas that is usually both the least likely proposal to be approved and, oddly, not the best design. Filling the gap entirely removes the sense of separation between houses that gives these streets their character, closes the only route for maintenance access to your own flank, and produces a ground floor that is wide but no better organised. The stronger approach is usually to take part of the width — enough to widen the plan meaningfully while leaving a strip for access and for the gap still to read from the street — and to set the extension back from the principal elevation so the original house remains the dominant form. Within a designated area that restraint is close to a requirement. Outside one it is still worth doing, because it protects the resale character of the house and avoids the practical problem of owning a wall you can never reach to maintain. Where a two-storey side extension is the ambition, the same logic applies more strongly at first-floor level, where the gap is most visible from the street.