Using the level change rather than fighting it
On a flat site a side return infill produces a wider version of the same room. On a Gospel Oak plot where the ground falls, the level change can be turned into the best feature of the project if it is designed deliberately. Where the passage and garden drop away from the house, stepping the new floor down by two or three risers gives the extended part a taller ceiling and a distinctly different character from the original room — a dining or sitting area that reads as its own space without needing a wall, with a change in ceiling height that pulls daylight deeper into the plan. Where the ground rises instead, the opposite move works: keeping the floor level and letting the garden come to meet it at a raised terrace, so the new room opens directly outside at the same level rather than looking up a retaining wall. Either approach needs the section drawn from the first sketch, the retaining structure designed by an engineer with drainage behind it, and the threshold detailed so external levels do not bridge the damp-proof course. Done well it produces a ground floor considerably more interesting than the flat equivalent. Done as an afterthought it produces an awkward step in the wrong place.