London
New Malden’s sample resolves to Kingston upon Thames, with Merton entering only after the authority search expands to 1,400 metres. Six conservation titles form New Malden’s local screen: Coombe Hill, Coombe House, Coombe Wood, Presburg Road, The Groves and Westcoombe Avenue. These names define possible mapped contexts, not a single designation covering New Malden. Kingston upon Thames is the confirmed starting route; Merton is a boundary consideration. An address-level check must establish whether any returned conservation area covers, adjoins or meaningfully relates to the property before architectural consequences are described.
Last updated
The short answer
Not as a whole. The search around New Malden returned six named conservation areas within 1,400 metres: Coombe Hill, Coombe House, Coombe Wood, Presburg Road and The Groves under Kingston upon Thames, plus Westcoombe Avenue under Merton. Whether any of them covers a particular property is only answered by checking that exact address against the council's official map.
Planning at a glance
New Malden
| Local planning authority | Confirm for the exact property address; the neighbourhood research point is not an address result |
|---|---|
| Likely approval route | Confirm from the exact address, property type, ownership, designation and proposed work before drawings begin |
| Statutory determination time | 8 weeks for most householder applications (13 weeks for major applications) |
| Where most projects start | Planning Route Review — £395 inc. VAT, credited in full against your package if you proceed. Find my package → |
Design advice for New Malden should follow the confirmed Kingston map result. If Coombe Hill, Coombe House, Coombe Wood, The Groves or another returned area is relevant, visible alterations may need drawings that explain scale, roof form, openings and materials against that particular context. Presburg Road or Westcoombe Avenue should shape the proposal only where the exact address or setting supports a connection. Near the Merton edge, authority ownership must be checked before precedents are used. Without a designation relationship, the project should not be presented as conservation-controlled by proximity alone.
A New Malden measured survey should establish existing elevations, roof geometry, boundaries and levels before the planning narrative is fixed. The file can then pair those facts with the Kingston upon Thames authority result and the applicable conservation boundary, if any. Where a Coombe or Groves record matters, proposed drawings should make the external effect clear. Where Merton or a nearby record does not apply, say so and omit its assumptions from the specification. This keeps technical development responsive to the property rather than to a generic New Malden location label.
Local analysis
New Malden’s boundary problem begins with a Kingston point and Merton radius result. The two-authority result matters because the conservation records themselves are divided between those councils. Confirm the full property and proposed works on current authority geometry before choosing policies or contacts.
A Kingston finding should not automatically attach every Kingston-coded conservation name, and a Merton radius result should not be treated as joint jurisdiction. The map conclusion instead provides the administrative frame within which the six separate designation questions can be tested accurately.
Five of New Malden’s six returned titles are Kingston-coded—Coombe Hill, Coombe House, Coombe Wood, Presburg Road and The Groves—while Westcoombe Avenue is a Merton record. The repeated “Coombe” sound is potentially misleading: three separate Kingston polygons and Westcoombe Avenue must not be merged into one local designation.
Check each exact extent against the property and name the owner alongside any confirmed relationship. A result for Coombe House does not establish Coombe Hill or Coombe Wood, and a Merton-owned Westcoombe Avenue finding has a different authority context from the research point.
Put the mapping questions at the front of a New Malden programme, inside the first paid stage rather than midway through design. Because the point result sits with Kingston upon Thames while Merton only surfaces inside the wider radius, a borough-edge surprise can strand a package already paid for.
A short feasibility stage that pairs a measured survey with address-level checks against the six returned conservation titles keeps the later, costlier stages honest. Householder decisions are commonly targeted at roughly eight weeks from validation, though that target slips, so build slack into any New Malden move-out or contractor date. Buy building-regulations and technical work after consent looks secure, not alongside the planning drawings.
Local services
Extensions, loft conversions and internal refurbishments each route differently in New Malden, and visibility from the street is usually the deciding factor. If the address check ties the property to a returned Kingston title or to Merton's Westcoombe Avenue record, conservation area work leads and the planning drawings must argue materials, scale and openings.
Where the check comes back clear, the same job usually needs only planning drawings and an application built on an accurate survey. Building-regulations drawings and a technical design or tender package come later, once the consented external principles are fixed and a builder needs something to price. Anyone unsure which of these applies should start with feasibility rather than a submission.
Local evidence
Coombe-name accuracy should lead the New Malden drawing strategy wherever current mapping establishes relevance. If Coombe House covers the property, use that title on the location material and select the elevation, section or view that explains the proposed external effect; a Coombe Hill or Coombe Wood relationship requires its own boundary reference.
Westcoombe Avenue should be identified as the Merton record when applicable. Keep the measured existing and proposed information centred on the commission property. Where none of the six polygons relates to it, omit designation captions and let the accurate property drawings stand without an invented conservation premise.
Local process
The New Malden project sequence should settle the Kingston–Merton question at the outset, then classify each returned conservation record for relevance. Concept design can proceed once Coombe Hill, Coombe Wood, The Groves, Presburg Road and Westcoombe Avenue have been checked against the site.
Planning evidence should address only the confirmed context, and technical drawings should preserve any agreed external principles. This route provides a clean audit trail and stops a close but unrelated Coombe or Merton precedent from entering the submission simply because it lies inside the search radius.
Thinking about a project in New Malden?
Send the address and a short description. We will confirm the likely approval route and the drawings your project needs.
Local planning
The New Malden research has a clear authority split to manage. Most returned conservation names sit within the Kingston context, while Merton’s proximity explains why borough-edge checking remains important. Westcoombe Avenue and the Coombe records should not be treated as synonyms or assumed to extend across the locality. A reliable profile should record Kingston upon Thames at the point, identify the live boundary associated with the address and state whether Merton has any actual role. Records found within the radius but unrelated to the property should remain evidence of a completed check, not decorative local claims.
Services
Heritage & Conservation
Technical & Building Regulations
Nearby
Send the New Malden address, photographs and intended work. We will identify the authority, designation and building questions to resolve before a full design or technical package is commissioned.
