London
New Malden’s sample resolves to Kingston upon Thames, with Merton entering only after the authority search expands to 1,400 metres. Six conservation titles form New Malden’s local screen: Coombe Hill, Coombe House, Coombe Wood, Presburg Road, The Groves and Westcoombe Avenue. These names define possible mapped contexts, not a single designation covering New Malden. Kingston upon Thames is the confirmed starting route; Merton is a boundary consideration. An address-level check must establish whether any returned conservation area covers, adjoins or meaningfully relates to the property before architectural consequences are described.
Last updated
Practice leadership
Eyal Moran, Director and Lead Architect, is an ARB-registered architect, leading design judgement, planning strategy and technical coordination across client projects.
Verify on the Architects RegisterPlanning at a glance
New Malden
| Local planning authority | Confirm for the exact property address; the neighbourhood research point is not an address result |
|---|---|
| Likely approval route | Confirm from the exact address, property type, ownership, designation and proposed work before drawings begin |
| Statutory determination time | 8 weeks for most householder applications (13 weeks for major applications) |
| Typical drawing package | £395–£4,950 inc. VAT, fixed fee. Find my package → |
Design advice for New Malden should follow the confirmed Kingston map result. If Coombe Hill, Coombe House, Coombe Wood, The Groves or another returned area is relevant, visible alterations may need drawings that explain scale, roof form, openings and materials against that particular context. Presburg Road or Westcoombe Avenue should shape the proposal only where the exact address or setting supports a connection. Near the Merton edge, authority ownership must be checked before precedents are used. Without a designation relationship, the project should not be presented as conservation-controlled by proximity alone.
A New Malden measured survey should establish existing elevations, roof geometry, boundaries and levels before the planning narrative is fixed. The file can then pair those facts with the Kingston upon Thames authority result and the applicable conservation boundary, if any. Where a Coombe or Groves record matters, proposed drawings should make the external effect clear. Where Merton or a nearby record does not apply, say so and omit its assumptions from the specification. This keeps technical development responsive to the property rather than to a generic New Malden location label.
Local analysis
New Malden’s boundary problem begins with a Kingston point and Merton radius result. The two-authority result matters because the conservation records themselves are divided between those councils. Confirm the full property and proposed works on current authority geometry before choosing policies or contacts.
A Kingston finding should not automatically attach every Kingston-coded conservation name, and a Merton radius result should not be treated as joint jurisdiction. The map conclusion instead provides the administrative frame within which the six separate designation questions can be tested accurately.
Five of New Malden’s six returned titles are Kingston-coded—Coombe Hill, Coombe House, Coombe Wood, Presburg Road and The Groves—while Westcoombe Avenue is a Merton record. The repeated “Coombe” sound is potentially misleading: three separate Kingston polygons and Westcoombe Avenue must not be merged into one local designation.
Check each exact extent against the property and name the owner alongside any confirmed relationship. A result for Coombe House does not establish Coombe Hill or Coombe Wood, and a Merton-owned Westcoombe Avenue finding has a different authority context from the research point.
Local evidence
Coombe-name accuracy should lead the New Malden drawing strategy wherever current mapping establishes relevance. If Coombe House covers the property, use that title on the location material and select the elevation, section or view that explains the proposed external effect; a Coombe Hill or Coombe Wood relationship requires its own boundary reference.
Westcoombe Avenue should be identified as the Merton record when applicable. Keep the measured existing and proposed information centred on the commission property. Where none of the six polygons relates to it, omit designation captions and let the accurate property drawings stand without an invented conservation premise.
Useful local facts
A New Malden homeowner should supply the exact address, a description of the intended work and photographs of affected external surfaces. We would verify Kingston upon Thames, inspect the nearby Merton boundary and compare the site with the six returned conservation records.
The first advice would distinguish the authority, applicable designation or setting, and excluded nearby areas. That concise local evidence is more useful than assuming that a New Malden property shares the conditions of Coombe Hill, The Groves or Westcoombe Avenue.
Local process
The New Malden project sequence should settle the Kingston–Merton question at the outset, then classify each returned conservation record for relevance. Concept design can proceed once Coombe Hill, Coombe Wood, The Groves, Presburg Road and Westcoombe Avenue have been checked against the site.
Planning evidence should address only the confirmed context, and technical drawings should preserve any agreed external principles. This route provides a clean audit trail and stops a close but unrelated Coombe or Merton precedent from entering the submission simply because it lies inside the search radius.
Decision checklist
For New Malden, compare the preferred option against the one evidence distinction most likely to be lost in shorthand: Kingston’s three Coombe records are separate from each other, and Westcoombe Avenue belongs to Merton. Confirm the address authority, identify the exact polygon and then ask what drawing or design change that relationship requires.
If the answer is none, do not let the shared name expand the scope. If a relationship is material, commission the specific view, section or appraisal needed for that record. This gives the client a defensible choice without presuming Kingston from the research point.
Thinking about a project in New Malden?
Send the address and a short description. We will confirm the likely approval route and the drawings your project needs.
Local planning
The New Malden research has a clear authority split to manage. Most returned conservation names sit within the Kingston context, while Merton’s proximity explains why borough-edge checking remains important. Westcoombe Avenue and the Coombe records should not be treated as synonyms or assumed to extend across the locality. A reliable profile should record Kingston upon Thames at the point, identify the live boundary associated with the address and state whether Merton has any actual role. Records found within the radius but unrelated to the property should remain evidence of a completed check, not decorative local claims.
Services
Architecture & Design
Extensions & Renovations
Planning & Consents
Heritage & Conservation
Technical & Building Regulations
Leasehold & Licence to Alter
Project Delivery & Support
For services without a dedicated New Malden page, use the London-wide overview to understand the scope, deliverables and next steps.
Architecture & Design
Interior Design
Extensions & Renovations
Planning & Consents
Heritage & Conservation
Leasehold & Licence to Alter
Project Delivery & Support
Nearby
Send the New Malden address, photographs and intended work. We will identify the authority, designation and building questions to resolve before a full design or technical package is commissioned.
