Why width usually beats depth on a Hendon plot
On a semi-detached house with a side gap the instinctive move is to extend straight back, and it is frequently the wrong one. The problem with the original plan is not that the kitchen is shallow; it is that it is narrow and cut off, occupying about half the width of the house with a wall between it and the rear reception room. Extending rearwards without addressing the width produces a longer narrow kitchen and leaves the awkwardness intact. Taking the side gap, or converting an attached garage into the plan, brings the room to the full width of the house and lets the kitchen, the dining area and a route to the garden coexist properly rather than queueing behind one another. The additional depth then only needs to be enough to make that width usable — often two or three metres rather than the maximum available. The result uses less garden, costs less to build per useful square metre, and produces a plan with more daylight in the middle because the room is not as deep. It also usually retains a permitted development or prior approval route that a very deep extension might not. We model both approaches at feasibility so the comparison is concrete rather than theoretical.