The single most consequential decision on a Putney rear extension is where the new back wall lands. Every other choice — glazing, roof, internal layout — follows from how far the extension projects beyond the existing rear building line, and that is what a Wandsworth case officer scrutinises first. The useful question is never how much room you could add but how far the house can push into the garden before the remaining outdoor space feels compromised, a neighbour's rear windows lose daylight, or the plot reads as over-developed. We test candidate depths in section against the garden that would be left, the boundary walls and the position of the neighbours on either side, then fix a projection that is both liveable inside and defensible when the application is assessed. On evidence, not optimism, the footprint is agreed before any elevation is drawn.
Putney's stock makes this a genuinely different problem street by street. On a late-Victorian bay-fronted terrace between the Upper Richmond Road and the Heath, the original plan usually has a rear closet wing and a slot of garden beside it, and a rear extension is about squaring that stepped back elevation into a full-width or partial-width addition while holding a workable projection. On an Edwardian or grander villa in West Putney the plot is deeper and the back garden more generous, so the constraint shifts from raw depth to the relationship with a semi-detached neighbour and the gap between houses. A riverside or Embankment house brings its setting into play more prominently still, where boundaries and views weigh as heavily as the projection itself. The same drawing template does not serve all three, so we start from your house type, its plot and the depth of garden actually behind the original rear wall rather than from a standard extension footprint that ignores those differences.
On a terrace, the neighbour relationship almost always governs the depth. Because the houses are attached and their rear elevations sit in a shared rhythm, a projection that would be unremarkable on a detached house can overshadow the adjoining home or block daylight to its nearest rear window. A full-width rear extension that removes the original return gives the most usable space but pushes hardest against that boundary, so we often test it against a stepped or partial-width alternative that keeps light reaching the neighbour. Wandsworth weighs the effect on adjoining amenity heavily, and a 45-degree relationship to the neighbour's rear windows is a common informal check, so we model the addition against both boundaries early and let that evidence set how far the back wall can reasonably go.
The larger West Putney villas open up options a terrace cannot carry. A deeper garden can absorb a more generous single-storey projection, and on some detached and semi-detached houses a two-storey rear addition becomes realistic — but the second storey changes the assessment entirely. First-floor windows introduce outlook and overlooking over a neighbour's garden, and the sense of enclosure over an attached property is far more sensitive on a semi-detached pair that shares a flank wall. The spacing between the villas is part of what gives West Putney its grain, so a rear addition that reads as bulk filling the gap is resisted where a subordinate, well-set-back form is not. We advise at feasibility which storey height a given villa and plot can actually support before the design commits to it, and where two storeys are not defensible we look at whether a deeper single storey, set well back from the shared boundary, delivers the space without the overlooking that sinks a scheme.
Riverside and Embankment houses are where setting does the most work. A rear extension here is generally hidden from the street, but the garden setting, the boundary treatment and the way the back of the house is read from surrounding space carry more weight, and where the property sits within the Putney Embankment conservation area the materials and the depth behind the original building line are assessed against that character. We keep the addition subordinate to the host — resolving how render, London stock brick or a restrained contemporary element sits against the existing rear wall, and detailing the junction so the extension reads as an addition rather than a competing mass. Whether conservation controls apply is confirmed for the exact address, because that determines how much the setting constrains the projection.
Daylight, right to light and the party wall process then have to be built into the scheme rather than discovered late. Wandsworth assesses daylight and sunlight to neighbouring windows using the established BRE tests, and a well-judged section — holding the height down near the boundary and stepping the roof away from the neighbour — usually keeps a rear extension within them. Right to light is a separate civil matter that a planning consent does not settle, so where the addition approaches a neighbour's window we flag it early. Because a rear extension excavates for foundations close to a boundary, the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 typically applies too. From there the route is coordinated: we survey the house, test the projection against these constraints, produce the planning drawings, and once the principle is settled prepare the building regulations package covering structure, drainage, insulation and the rest for construction.