Start with the mansion-flat case, because it is the more common kitchen brief around Regent's Park given how much of the local stock is leasehold apartments rather than whole houses. Moving a kitchen within a flat, or extending it into an adjoining room, usually means cutting a structural opening in a floor slab or internal wall that other flats above and below rely on, and relocating a sink or hob changes where waste and supply pipes run through risers shared with neighbours. None of this is a council planning matter in the first instance; it is a freeholder matter, assessed through a Licence to Alter, and the freeholder's surveyor will want structural calculations, a drainage strategy and evidence of how noise and fire separation are maintained before consent is given, often well before any building work is priced.
That Licence to Alter process runs on its own timetable and its own evidence set, separate from any council planning application and separate again from building regulations approval. A freeholder's technical check typically wants to see how a new structural opening is supported, how an acoustic floor build-up compensates for lost mass where a slab is cut, and how fire stopping is reinstated around any new penetration for pipework or ductwork. We prepare that package specifically for the managed-flat audience rather than assuming the drawings produced for a planning submission will also satisfy a freeholder's surveyor, because the two audiences are asking different questions of the same design, and a package built for one rarely answers the other without rework.
The townhouse and park-edge terrace case is a different technical problem, even though the word 'kitchen extension' sounds the same. Here a kitchen extension is more often a rear single-storey addition or a lower-ground kitchen opening onto a light well, and the question shifts from freeholder consent to garden depth, daylight to neighbouring windows and how a below-ground kitchen gets natural light and safe means of escape. A lower-ground kitchen usually depends on a light well or sunken area at the back or side of the house, and the size, depth and railing treatment of that light well is itself a design and planning consideration, particularly where it is visible from a formal street frontage rather than tucked away in a rear garden.
Because Regent's Park's park-edge streets are treated as a detail-sensitive setting by both Camden and Westminster material, even a kitchen extension that sits below ground or at the rear can draw scrutiny through its street-visible elements: a new railing around a light well, a rooflight or vent at pavement level, or altered brickwork on a rear return glimpsed from a side passage. We treat those details as part of the planning submission rather than an afterthought resolved on site, because they are often what a case officer or conservation adviser looks at first, well before they consider the kitchen layout itself.
Structure sits underneath both versions of the brief, though the load path is different in each. A rear or lower-ground kitchen extension on a terrace usually needs new foundations close to the existing house and, if it steps below the damp-proof course, waterproofing designed to current guidance for habitable below-ground space. A kitchen extension within a mansion flat instead needs the existing slab and its supporting structure understood before any opening is cut, because floor loadings, fire compartmentation between flats and the position of existing risers are all fixed by the building's original design, not by what the new kitchen layout would prefer, and a structural engineer's input is not optional in either case.
Sequencing differs between the two routes as well. For a flat, we typically progress the Licence to Alter evidence alongside any planning input needed for street-visible elements, then move to building regulations once the freeholder's surveyor has confirmed the structural and drainage approach, so that construction pricing is not built on an unapproved assumption. For a house, we usually settle the planning strategy for the extension and its light well first, because that decides the footprint and depth, then develop the structural and waterproofing detail for building regulations and tender. In both cases the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 is checked early, since kitchen structural openings very often sit close to a shared wall in either building type, and notices take time to serve and respond to.